Not logged in
  Home   Markets   Shares   Funds   Portfolio   Toolbox   Charting   Alerts   Directory   
 Admin   

Tue 1 Sep 2009, 16:20 THEE - The Media release from Competition Commission
JSE
THEE                                                                            
THEE - The Media release from Competition Commission                            
The Competition Commission                                                      
1 September 2009                                                                
The Media release from Competition Commission                                   
Competition Commission requests fines for steel companies and initiates         
construction sector investigation                                               
The Competition Commission today referred findings of its investigation         
into collusion by four producers of long steel products in South Africa and     
their industry association to the Competition Tribunal for prosecution.         
In a separate matter, the Commission initiated an industry wide                 
investigation into collusive practices in the construction industry, a          
priority sector for the Commission.                                             
Prosecution of steel companies                                                  
The Commission is recommending that the Competition Tribunal impose an          
administrative penalty against ArcelorMittal South Africa Limited, Cape         
Gate (Pty) Limited and Cape Town Iron Steel Works (Pty) Limited amounting       
to 10% of their annual turnover in South Africa and their exports from the      
Republic for the preceding financial year.                                      
On 22 April 2008 the Commissioner initiated a complaint against producers       
of long and flat steel products and pursued an investigation concerning         
steel mills as well as steel merchants in South Africa. The investigation       
was as a result of concerns raised by the Department of Trade and Industry      
and research conducted by the Commission which suggested that the steel         
mills were charging local steel customers at around import parity price         
levels since 2002; notwithstanding that South Africa is a net exporter of       
steel.                                                                          
Following a search-and-seizure operation in some of the respondent`s            
premises one of the respondents investigated, Scaw South Africa (Pty) Ltd,      
applied for corporate leniency for price fixing and market allocation in        
relation to rebar, wire rod, sections (including rounds, squares, angles        
and profiles). Scaw admitted its participation in the cartel and confirmed      
that there has been a long-standing culture of cooperation amongst the          
steel mills regarding the prices to be charged, and discounts to be             
offered, for their steel products. The cooperation extended to arrangements     
for market division.                                                            
The Commission`s investigation confirmed the allegations made by Scaw and       
uncovered further evidence of collusion. The Commission found that the four     
producers exchanged information by using their membership in The South          
African Iron and Steel Institute (SAISI) to facilitate cartel activity,         
which involved price fixing, the fixing of trading conditions and market        
division.                                                                       
The Competition Commission has therefore referred a complaint to the            
Competition Tribunal against the alleged parties for an order in the            
following terms:                                                                
-    Declaring that Mittal, Cape Gate and Cape Town Iron Steel Works commit or  
    committed a prohibited practice in contravention of section 4(1)(b)(i) and  
    (ii) of the Competition Act, 89 of 1998 ("the Act");                        
-    Interdicting them from contravening section 4(1)(b)(i) and (ii) of the     
    Competition Act, 89 of 1998 ("the Act");                                    
-    Interdicting all of the respondents from exchanging and/or facilitating    
    the exchange of sensitive market information, i.e. in any manner that       
facilitates collusion amongst any of the respondents.                       
    Investigation into collusive practices in construction industry             
Since March 2009, the Commission has received several applications for          
corporate leniency from construction companies for collusive practices with     
respect to certain construction projects.                                       
The Commission`s preliminary investigations on the projects covered in the      
CLP applications indicate that there may be wide spread collusion in the        
construction industry. In particular, the applications revealed that the        
following collusive practices could be prevalent in the sector:                 
-    Price fixing in the form of fixing margins for tenders and compensating    
    the losing bidder;                                                          
-    Allocation of customers/projects/tenders through the use of score cards;   
-    Collusive tendering by submitting uncompetitive bids (cover pricing).      
The Commission`s preliminary investigations also show that construction         
firms, which will ordinarily bid independently, often form joint ventures       
when bidding for certain projects. In so far as they bring competitors          
together, these joint ventures may be used as a platform to engage in           
collusive practices. Some of the joint ventures have permanent status and       
continue to be used by competitors in the industry as a platform for            
sharing sensitive competitive information.                                      
Consequently the Commission has initiated an industry wide investigation        
against Grinaker, Stefanutti, Group Five, WBHO, Concor, Liviero, Giuricich,     
Hochtief, Dura, Nishimatsu, Esorfranki, VNA Pilings, Rodio, Diabor, Gauteng     
Piling, Fairbrother, Geomechanics, Murray & Roberts, Aveng and other firms,     
including joint ventures in the construction industry.                          
Such collusive practices tend to distort competition and increase prices.       
This is particularly problematic given the recent boom in activity in           
infrastructure and construction in the country, as it implies that costs        
have been inflated while above desirable competitive levels - creating          
burden on the state and the economy. The collusive practices may also slow      
down delivery of key infrastructure as well as houses in the country.           
"International experience has shown that collusive practices of this nature     
are also prevalent in the construction industry in other countries" says        
Tembinkosi Bonakele, the Deputy Commissioner. "Examples include the             
Netherlands and the United Kingdom where a large number of construction         
firms took advantage of the corporate leniency policy to come forward and       
to clean up their act once investigations were launched."                       
ENDS                                                                            
Prepared by: FD Beachhead                                                       
Jennifer Cohen 011 214 2401/ 082 468 6469/ jennifer.cohen@fd.com                
Dani Cohen 021 487 9021 / 082 897 0443 dani.cohen@fd.com                        
Senzi Dlamini 011 214 2420 / 073 494 0030 senzi.dlamini@fd.com                  
On behalf of: The Competition Commission                                        
Further info:                                                                   
Keitumetse Letebele, HOD Communications                                         
012 394 3200 / 082 783 3397                                                     
Jennifer Cohen                                                                  
Managing Director, FDBeachhead                                                  
Johannesburg                                                                    
1st Floor, Lumley House, Rosebank Office Park                                   
177 Jan Smuts Avenue, Parktown North                                            
Johannesburg, 2193                                                              
T +27 (0)11 2142401                                                             
F +27 11 214 2405                                                               
M +27 (0)82 468 6469                                                            
www.fd.com                                                                      
A member of FTI Consulting, Inc.                                                
Date: 01/09/2009 16:20:01 Produced by the JSE SENS Department.                  
The SENS service is an information dissemination service administered by the    
JSE Limited (`JSE`). The JSE does not, whether expressly, tacitly or            
implicitly, represent, warrant or in any way guarantee the truth, accuracy or   
completeness of the information published on SENS. The JSE, their officers,     
employees and agents accept no liability for (or in respect of) any direct,     
indirect, incidental or consequential loss or damage of any kind or nature,     
howsoever arising, from the use of SENS or the use of, or reliance on,          
information disseminated through SENS.                                          
Profile Group (Pty) Ltd. has taken care in preparing all information on this website, but does not accept any liability for errors or out-of-date information.
Other Profile Group sites: FundsData Online (unit trust data)  |  Profile Group corporate site
Terms of Use |  Privacy Policy |  PAIA manual |  FAQs/Help |  Site Map |  © Copyright Reserved 2026  ]
  


Powered by ProfileData

Profile Mobile App Google Play Store Apple App Store


Follow us on: