Not logged in
  Home   Markets   Shares   Funds   Portfolio   Toolbox   Charting   Alerts   Directory   
 Admin   

Thu 12 Nov 2009, 10:15 GEN - Huge - Censures imposed by the JSE on Huge Group Limited and
JSE
GEN                                                                             
GEN - Huge - Censures imposed by the JSE on Huge Group Limited and              
Messrs. James Herbst and Anton Potgieter                                        
Censures imposed by the JSE on Huge Group  Limited and Messrs. James            
Herbst and Anton Potgieter                                                      
The Johannesburg Stock Exchange Limited ("JSE") wishes to advise the            
following in view of its previous announcement dated 19 March 2009              
concerning certain findings by the JSE in respect of the Huge Group             
Limited`s ("Huge" or "the Company") acquisition of Single Stock                 
Futures ("SSF") positions from two executive directors of Huge,                 
Messrs. James Herbst and Anton Potgieter ("the Directors") and the              
resultant repurchases by Huge of its own securities:                            
1.   On 7 November 2008, the JSE found that Huge`s acquisition of 80            
 445 SSF positions constituted a repurchase of the Company`s                    
 securities as defined in section 5.69 of the JSE`s Listings                    
 Requirements ("the Listings Requirements"), that the transaction was           
concluded with related parties (namely the Directors) and that                 
 Huge`s acquisition of the SSF positions was in contravention of                
 section 85 of the Companies Act, 61 of 1973 ("the Companies Act").             
2.   Huge elected to exercise its right to object to the JSE`s                  
decision and the JSE decided to consult with three independent                 
 members of the Issuer Services Advisory Committee ("the Advisory               
 Committee") to assist the JSE in its consideration of Huge`s                   
 objection. The members of the Advisory Committee unanimously                   
dismissed Huge`s objection. The JSE then considered the ground`s of            
 Huge`s objection, the views of the independent members of the                  
 Advisory Committee and all other facts and information at its                  
 disposal and also decided to dismiss Huge`s objection.                         
3.   The JSE informed Huge of its final decision on 4 March 2009 and            
 invited Huge to make representations regarding the imposition of an            
 appropriate penalty on the Company as a result of its breaches of              
 the Listings Requirements and the Companies Act. The JSE also                  
informed Huge that Huge has the obligation to publish an                       
 announcement on SENS that its acquisition of the SSF positions                 
 constituted a specific repurchase of securities as defined in                  
 section 5.69 of the Listings Requirements and that the acquisition             
was in contravention of the Listings Requirements. The JSE also                
 requested Huge to forthwith take all necessary steps to ensure that            
 the Company complies with the provisions of the Listings                       
 Requirements and the Companies Act.                                            
4.   On 9 March 2009, Huge informed the JSE that it accepted the                
 JSE`s final decision and Huge furnished the JSE with its submissions           
 regarding the imposition of a sanction on the Company. The JSE                 
 considered Huge`s submissions and all the facts and information at             
its disposal and decided to impose a public censure on Huge as a               
 result of its breaches of the Listings Requirements and the                    
 Company`s Act. The JSE communicated this decision to Huge on 25 June           
 2009.                                                                          
5.   In addition, and insofar as the Directors had caused Huge to               
 commit the aforesaid contraventions, the JSE addressed a letter to             
 the Directors dated 23 March 2009 relating to Huge`s acquisition of            
 the SSF positions and the JSE`s findings in respect thereof. The JSE           
stated that the Directors` actions in this regard may be contrary to           
 the Companies Act and/or the Listings Requirements and afforded the            
 Directors the opportunity to furnish the JSE with their response to            
 the JSE`s concerns as well as all other facts and information at               
their disposal.                                                                
6.   The Directors furnished the JSE with their submissions on 2                
 April 2009. The JSE then considered these submissions and all other            
 facts and information at its disposal and decided that the actions             
of the Directors amounted to a material breach of their fiduciary              
 duties towards Huge and its shareholders. The JSE also decided that            
 the Directors` actions in respect of the Company`s acquisition of              
 the SSF positions resulted in the breach of the Listings                       
Requirements by Huge in that the Company`s acquisition of the                  
 Directors` SSF positions constituted a specific repurchase of Huge`s           
 securities as defined in section 5.69 of the Listings Requirements             
 and that the acquisition of the SSF positions is a transaction with            
a related party. In these circumstances, Huge`s acquisition of the             
 SSF positions amounted to a contravention of section 5.69 of the               
 Listings Requirements and section 85 of the Companies Act.                     
7.   The Directors informed the JSE on 17 April 2009 that they                  
objected to the decision of the JSE and requested the JSE to consult           
 with three independent members of the Advisory Committee as provided           
 for in section 1.4 of the Listings Requirements.                               
8.   The JSE referred the Directors` objection to three independent             
members of the Advisory Committee as provided for in section 1.4 of            
 the Listings Requirements to assist the JSE in its consideration of            
 the Directors` objection. The members of the Advisory Committee                
 unanimously dismissed the Directors` objection. The JSE then                   
considered the grounds of the Directors` objection, the views of the           
 independent members of the Advisory Committee and all other facts              
 and information at its disposal and decided to dismiss the                     
 Directors` objection. The JSE afforded the Directors the opportunity           
to make submissions regarding the imposition of an appropriate                 
 penalty on the Directors as a result of their transgressions of the            
 Listings Requirements and the Companies Act.                                   
9.   The Directors furnished the JSE with their submissions                     
regarding the imposition of an appropriate penalty on 30 September             
 2009. The JSE considered these submissions as well as all the other            
 facts and information at its disposal and decided to impose the                
 penalty of a public censure on the Directors as well as a fine in an           
amount of R 5 000 000.00 each on Messrs. Potgieter and Herbst as a             
 result of the breaches of their fiduciary duties as directors of               
 Huge and their actions that had resulted in breaches by Huge of the            
 Listings Requirements. The JSE informed the Directors of its                   
decision in its letter dated 9 October 2009.                                   
                                                                                
10.  The Directors objected to the penalties that the JSE had                   
 imposed and furnished the JSE with the reasons for their objections            
in letters dated 13 and 16 October and 2 November 2009. The JSE                
 considered the objection lodged by the Directors and dismissed their           
 objection on 12 November 2009.                                                 
12 November 2009                                                                
Date: 12/11/2009 10:15:01 Produced by the JSE SENS Department.
Profile Group (Pty) Ltd. has taken care in preparing all information on this website, but does not accept any liability for errors or out-of-date information.
Other Profile Group sites: FundsData Online (unit trust data)  |  Profile Group corporate site
Terms of Use |  Privacy Policy |  PAIA manual |  FAQs/Help |  Site Map |  © Copyright Reserved 2026  ]
  


Powered by ProfileData

Profile Mobile App Google Play Store Apple App Store


Follow us on: