Not logged in
  Home   Markets   Shares   Funds   Portfolio   Toolbox   Charting   Alerts   Directory   
 Admin   

Wed 23 May 2012, 12:13 BTI - British American Tobacco P.l.c. - Supreme Court Judgment in the FII Group
BTI
BTI                                                                             
BTI - British American Tobacco P.l.c. - Supreme Court Judgment in the FII Group 
Litigation                                                                      
British American Tobacco p.l.c.                                                 
Incorporated in England and Wales                                               
(Registration number: 03407696)                                                 
Short name: BATS                                                                
Share code: BTI                                                                 
ISIN number: GB0002875804                                                       
("British American Tobacco p.l.c." or "the Company")                            
British American Tobacco p.l.c.                                                 
Supreme Court Judgment in the FII Group Litigation                              
The Supreme Court today handed down its judgment in the case of The Test        
Claimants in the FII Group Litigation v The Commissioners for HM Revenue and    
Customs.  The British American Tobacco group is the principal test claimant in  
that group litigation (GLO) in which the claims of 25 company groups are        
enrolled.                                                                       
The judgment is complex and extends to 190 pages.  British American Tobacco will
be studying the judgment in detail with external counsel and deciding on the    
future course of action.                                                        
The judgment concerns a number of issues but the main issue of relevance to     
British American Tobacco concerned the lawfulness of retrospective legislation  
introduced by s107 of Finance Act 2007 (FA `07).                                
The claimants in the GLO contend that they were discriminated against in breach 
of EU law by the imposition of UK corporation tax charges, mostly in the form of
advance corporation tax (ACT), upon the distribution of foreign sourced income. 
Profits were effectively subject to double taxation, firstly in the source state
and then in the UK when distributed to shareholders.  British American Tobacco  
issued its claim in the litigation in June 2003 and its case was referred to the
European Court (ECJ) in 2004.  In 2006, six days before the ECJ was due to      
release its ruling, HMRC announced retrospective legislation which became s107  
of FA `07, to cancel all restitution claims in tax matters which extended back  
longer than six years such as those of British American Tobacco and others in   
the GLO who had issued claims at about the same time.  Before the intervention  
of this retrospective change these claims could be made for tax liabilities     
going back to 1973 in most cases.  The judgment of the ECJ which then followed  
that announcement did largely find discrimination and favoured the taxpayers.   
In 2008 the High Court held that the retrospective cancellation of these claims 
by s107 of FA `07 was also a breach of EU law.  In 2010 the Court of Appeal     
unanimously overturned that judgment.  In this judgment the Supreme Court       
sitting as a panel of 7 judges (reserved for the most important of its cases)   
has unanimously held that s107 of FA `07 was in breach of EU law and has        
restored the claimants` claims.                                                 
The effect of the judgment is to enable British American Tobacco and other      
claimants who issued their claims at about the same time to pursue claims for   
the recovery of unlawfully imposed UK corporation tax back, in most cases, to   
1973.  Although the ECJ has ruled largely in favour of the taxpayers in those   
claims, the value of the claims is subject to a second reference to the ECJ.    
The Advocate General`s opinion in that reference is due on 28 June 2012.  It is 
not known when the judgment of the court will follow.  Once the ECJ judgment is 
delivered the matter will then revert to the UK courts.                         
British American Tobacco cannot comment on the views or reaction of HMRC to this
judgment however further issues in the litigation are likely to remain which    
could take several years to resolve.                                            
23 May 2012                                                                     
Sponsor: UBS South Africa (Pty) Ltd                                             
Date: 23/05/2012 12:13:01 Produced by the JSE SENS Department.                  
The SENS service is an information dissemination service administered by the    
JSE Limited (`JSE`). The JSE does not, whether expressly, tacitly or            
implicitly, represent, warrant or in any way guarantee the truth, accuracy or   
completeness of the information published on SENS. The JSE, their officers,     
employees and agents accept no liability for (or in respect of) any direct,     
indirect, incidental or consequential loss or damage of any kind or nature,     
howsoever arising, from the use of SENS or the use of, or reliance on,          
information disseminated through SENS.                                          
Profile Group (Pty) Ltd. has taken care in preparing all information on this website, but does not accept any liability for errors or out-of-date information.
Other Profile Group sites: FundsData Online (unit trust data)  |  Profile Group corporate site
Terms of Use |  Privacy Policy |  PAIA manual |  FAQs/Help |  Site Map |  © Copyright Reserved 2026  ]
  


Powered by ProfileData

Profile Mobile App Google Play Store Apple App Store


Follow us on: